Clicky

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320

Portability
91
Imaging
39
Features
46
Overall
41
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Sony HX9V
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
  • Introduced July 2011
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Released January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Sony HX9V vs Sony W320, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact and both are produced by Sony. The image resolution of the HX9V (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The HX9V was revealed 19 months later than the W320 making them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Sony HX9V being a Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the HX9V matches up versus the W320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Sony W320

 HX9V W320 
ReleasedJuly 2011January 2010More recent by 19 months
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kClearer display (+691k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sony HX9V

 W320 HX9V 

Common features in the Sony HX9V and Sony W320

 HX9V W320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Sony HX9V offers exterior dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") along with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Analyze the Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the HX9V versus the W320.

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the HX9V and W320 is 91 and 97 respectively.

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The photograph here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the HX9V and W320.

Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Sony HX9V to give more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The newer HX9V is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sony HX9V Portrait photography factors
Sony W320 Portrait photography factors
39
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
28
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sony HX9V
Street photography with Sony W320
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (245 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
49
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Sony HX9V
Sports photography with Sony W320
44
long zoom range (24-384mm 16.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
resolution is good (14MP)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Sony HX9V Travel photography information
Sony W320 Travel photography information
69
lighter than competition in class (245 grams)
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (384mm)
no Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
66
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Sony HX9V Landscape photography highlights
Sony W320 Landscape photography highlights
49
manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
33
relatively wide (26mm)
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Sony HX9V
Vlogging with Sony W320
33
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (245g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
no external mic socket
26
relatively wide (26mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sony HX9V vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony HX9V and Sony W320
 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9VSony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Sony Sony
Model type Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Introduced 2011-07-19 2010-01-07
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor BIONZ -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-384mm (16.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.9 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing range - 4cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 921 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, AVCHD Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 245g (0.54 pounds) 117g (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-BG1 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $328 $269