Sony T900 vs Sony A68
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
64 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
Sony T900 vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2015
- Previous Model is Sony A65
Sony T900 vs Sony A68 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Sony T900 versus Sony A68, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR and they are both offered by Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the T900 (12MP) and A68 (24MP) and the T900 (1/2.3") and A68 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe T900 was introduced 7 years earlier than the A68 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the T900 matches up versus the A68 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sony T900 vs Sony A68 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 & Sony SLT-A68. The whole galleries are viewable at Sony T900 Gallery & Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sony A68
T900 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 461k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Sony T900
A68 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2015 | February 2009 | Newer by 81 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Sony T900 and Sony A68
T900 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Sony T900 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Sony T900 enjoys outside dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs) whilst the Sony A68 has dimensions of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") and a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
Analyze the Sony T900 versus Sony A68 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the T900 versus the A68.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the T900 and A68 is 96 and 64 respectively.
Sony T900 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the T900 and A68.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The T900 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A68 will show extra detail using its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged T900 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Sony T900 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony T900 vs Sony A68 Specifications
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | Sony SLT-A68 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2015-11-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 79 |
Cross focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-10.0 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.5" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 922 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 2s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 143g (0.32 lbs) | 610g (1.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 510 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $581 |