Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06c45/06c45f6f5b846783e631f6931199f2be5a86bfef" alt="Canon EOS M200 front Canon EOS M200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98c19/98c19f1e206fef2b7082ca35d2654d41c45093a9" alt="Leica M11 Monochrome front Leica M11 Monochrome front"
76 Imaging
84 Features
52 Overall
71
Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2019
- Succeeded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 60MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 50000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 640g - 139 x 80 x 39mm
- Introduced April 2023
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Canon M200 versus Leica M11 Monochrome, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Canon and Leica. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and M11 Monochrome (60MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and M11 Monochrome (Full frame) come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The M200 was manufactured 4 years before the M11 Monochrome and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the M200 matches up versus the M11 Monochrome in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon EOS M200 & Leica M11 Monochrome. The entire galleries are provided at Canon M200 Gallery & Leica M11 Monochrome Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Leica M11 Monochrome
M200 | M11 Monochrome | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Leica M11 Monochrome over the Canon M200
M11 Monochrome | M200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2023 | ![]() | September 2019 | More recent by 43 months |
Screen resolution | 2333k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper screen (+1293k dot) |
Common features in the Canon M200 and Leica M11 Monochrome
M200 | M11 Monochrome | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3.00" | Identical screen measurement |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon M200 offers outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) and the Leica M11 Monochrome has sizing of 139mm x 80mm x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 640 grams (1.41 lbs).
Contrast the Canon M200 versus Leica M11 Monochrome in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the M200 and the M11 Monochrome.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9264f/9264f8f9593954a236f10875ce109901a33edba9" alt="Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome size comparison Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M200 and M11 Monochrome is 88 and 76 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ddac/8ddacdd5009a2c13fdaebf9060490d8dbb114f3d" alt="Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome top view buttons comparison Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome top view buttons comparison"
Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The graphic below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and M11 Monochrome.
All in all, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M200 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Leica M11 Monochrome will produce greater detail due to its extra 36 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older M200 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd8b5/dd8b5fc7facccec93a0881d3b7f8b93ac4093380" alt="Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome sensor size comparison Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome sensor size comparison"
Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c815/9c815bd19119b648647ec64e52ec564f9609337e" alt="Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon M200 vs Leica M11 Monochrome Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Leica M11 Monochrome | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Leica |
Model | Canon EOS M200 | Leica M11 Monochrome |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-09-25 | 2023-04-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 8 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 60MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 9528 x 6328 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 50000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon EF-M | Leica M |
Number of lenses | 23 | 62 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.00" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 2,333k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 3600 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.1 frames/s | 4.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | - |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 299g (0.66 pounds) | 640g (1.41 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 139 x 80 x 39mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 100 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3376 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 shots | 700 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E12 | BC-SCL7 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12s) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | UHS II type SD |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $549 | $9,195 |