Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III
88 Imaging
69 Features
80 Overall
73
![Canon EOS M200 front Canon EOS M200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-EOS-M200/Canon-M200-front.jpg)
![Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-Mark-III.jpg)
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 299g - 108 x 67 x 35mm
- Introduced September 2019
- Superseded the Canon M100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Canon M200 and Olympus E-M10 III, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the M200 (24MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the M200 (APS-C) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The M200 was launched 2 years after the E-M10 III which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the M200 grades vs the E-M10 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The complete galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Olympus E-M10 III
M200 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2019 | ![]() | August 2017 | Newer by 26 months |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Canon M200
E-M10 III | M200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M200 and Olympus E-M10 III
M200 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1040k | Exact same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon M200 enjoys outer measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 III has proportions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon M200 and Olympus E-M10 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the M200 vs the E-M10 III.
![Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-M200-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-Mark-III-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the M200 and E-M10 III is 88 and 80 respectively.
![Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-M200-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-Mark-III-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the M200 and E-M10 III.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M200 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Canon M200 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The younger M200 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
![Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-EOS-M200-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-Mark-III-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-M200-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-Mark-III-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Canon M200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Canon EOS M200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon EOS M200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-09-25 | 2017-08-31 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 8 | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 23 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.1 frames/s | 8.6 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 299g (0.66 pounds) | 410g (0.90 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 315 pictures | 330 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E12 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $549 | $650 |