Canon M50 vs Fujifilm F900EXR
79 Imaging
68 Features
88 Overall
76
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Canon M50 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 390g - 116 x 88 x 59mm
- Announced February 2018
- Successor is Canon M50 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Superseded the Fujifilm F800EXR
Canon M50 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Canon M50 versus Fujifilm F900EXR, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the M50 (24MP) and Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) and the M50 (APS-C) and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") enjoy different sensor measurements.
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsThe M50 was launched 5 years after the Fujifilm F900EXR which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Canon M50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Fujifilm F900EXR being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the M50 matches up vs the Fujifilm F900EXR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon M50 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M50 & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The complete galleries are available at Canon M50 Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M50 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
M50 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | January 2013 | Newer by 62 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Canon M50
Fujifilm F900EXR | M50 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M50 and Fujifilm F900EXR
M50 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Canon M50 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon M50 enjoys outer measurements of 116mm x 88mm x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Fujifilm F900EXR has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Canon M50 versus Fujifilm F900EXR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the M50 and the Fujifilm F900EXR.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M50 and Fujifilm F900EXR is 79 and 90 respectively.
Canon M50 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The image below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M50 and Fujifilm F900EXR.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M50 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Canon M50 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger M50 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon M50 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon M50 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
Canon EOS M50 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon EOS M50 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2018-02-26 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 8 | EXR II |
Sensor type | CMOS | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2" |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon EF-M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 23 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | No | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 232g (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 88 x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 235 images | 260 images |
Style of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $779 | $380 |