Canon M50 vs Olympus E-PL1
79 Imaging
67 Features
88 Overall
75


86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Canon M50 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon EF-M Mount
- 390g - 116 x 88 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Updated by Canon M50 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released May 2010
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL1s

Canon M50 vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Canon M50 versus Olympus E-PL1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the M50 (24MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the M50 (APS-C) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizing.

The M50 was announced 7 years after the E-PL1 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon M50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the M50 grades vs the E-PL1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon M50 vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M50 & Olympus PEN E-PL1. The whole galleries are available at Canon M50 Gallery & Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon M50 over the Olympus E-PL1
M50 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | May 2010 | Newer by 95 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Canon M50
E-PL1 | M50 |
---|
Common features in the Canon M50 and Olympus E-PL1
M50 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Canon M50 vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon M50 provides physical measurements of 116mm x 88mm x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL1 has measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Compare the Canon M50 versus Olympus E-PL1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the M50 and the E-PL1.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M50 and E-PL1 is 79 and 86 respectively.

Canon M50 vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M50 and E-PL1.
Clearly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M50 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Canon M50 will offer greater detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer M50 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon M50 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M50 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
Canon EOS M50 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon EOS M50 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2018-02-26 | 2010-05-17 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic 8 | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 23 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | No | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 334 grams (0.74 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 88 x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 487 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 235 images | 290 images |
Battery form | Built-in | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $779 | $288 |