Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung TL225
96 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Alternate Name is ST550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung TL225 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Canon A2400 IS and Samsung TL225, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the A2400 IS (16MP) and TL225 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A2400 IS was announced 2 years after the TL225 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Canon A2400 IS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the A2400 IS matches up versus the TL225 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A2400 IS and Samsung TL225. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon A2400 IS Gallery and Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2400 IS over the Samsung TL225
| A2400 IS | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | August 2009 | Newer by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Canon A2400 IS
| TL225 | A2400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+922k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon A2400 IS and Samsung TL225
| A2400 IS | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Canon A2400 IS enjoys external dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Canon A2400 IS and Samsung TL225 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the A2400 IS against the TL225.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A2400 IS and TL225 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2400 IS and TL225.
As you have seen, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Canon A2400 IS to provide you with extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher A2400 IS should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2400 IS | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A2400 IS | Samsung TL225 |
| Also called | - | ST550 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2009-08-13 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,152k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126 gr (0.28 pounds) | 187 gr (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $149 | $488 |
