Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F750EXR
96 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F750EXR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the A3400 IS (16MP) and the Fujifilm F750EXR (16MP) is very similar but the A3400 IS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F750EXR (1/2") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A3400 IS was launched 2 months after the Fujifilm F750EXR and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the A3400 IS matches up versus the Fujifilm F750EXR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS & Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A3400 IS Gallery & Fujifilm F750EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Fujifilm F750EXR
| A3400 IS | Fujifilm F750EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F750EXR over the Canon A3400 IS
| Fujifilm F750EXR | A3400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Fujifilm F750EXR
| A3400 IS | Fujifilm F750EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 | January 2012 | Similar age | |
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon A3400 IS has outer dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F750EXR has measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 234 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F750EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the A3400 IS compared to the Fujifilm F750EXR.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the A3400 IS and Fujifilm F750EXR is 96 and 90 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The image below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the A3400 IS and Fujifilm F750EXR.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact resolution but not the same sensor sizes. The A3400 IS offers the tinier sensor which will make getting shallow DOF more challenging.
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon A3400 IS vs Fujifilm F750EXR Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2012-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | EXR |
| Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 126 grams (0.28 lb) | 234 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $230 | $445 |