Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus 9000
96 Imaging
38 Features
35 Overall
36
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the A3400 IS (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A3400 IS was manufactured 2 years after the 9000 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the A3400 IS grades against the 9000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A3400 IS and Olympus Stylus 9000. The entire galleries are available at Canon A3400 IS Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3400 IS over the Olympus 9000
| A3400 IS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 34 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon A3400 IS
| 9000 | A3400 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus 9000
| A3400 IS | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Canon A3400 IS enjoys outside dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has specifications of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Canon A3400 IS and Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the A3400 IS against the 9000.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the A3400 IS and 9000 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by looking at specifications. The image underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the A3400 IS and 9000.
To sum up, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Canon A3400 IS to resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer A3400 IS provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon A3400 IS vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3400 IS | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also called as | - | mju 9000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 126 gr (0.28 lb) | 225 gr (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $230 | $300 |