Clicky

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
19
Overall
27
Canon PowerShot A800 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Canon A800
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-122mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 186g - 94 x 61 x 31mm
  • Launched January 2011
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Lets look closer at the Canon A800 versus Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the A800 (10MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The A800 was manufactured 12 months before the VR-340 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the A800 scores against the VR-340 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

				

Reasons to pick Canon A800 over the Olympus VR-340

 A800 VR-340 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Canon A800

 VR-340 A800 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012January 2011Newer by 12 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k115kCrisper display (+345k dot)

Common features in the Canon A800 and Olympus VR-340

 A800 VR-340 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon A800 enjoys outer dimensions of 94mm x 61mm x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 186 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Analyze the Canon A800 versus Olympus VR-340 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the A800 compared to the VR-340.

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the A800 and VR-340 is 93 and 96 respectively.

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The image underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the A800 and VR-340.

Plainly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-340 to show extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged A800 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A800 Portrait photography info
Olympus VR-340 Portrait photography info
25
has face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
34
decent megapixels (16MP)
comes with face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Canon A800 Street photography factors
Olympus VR-340 Street photography factors
46
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (125 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Canon A800 Sports photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Sports photography advice
29
has tracking focus
good battery pack (300 shots)
low fps (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Canon A800 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Travel photography camera
55
good battery pack (300 per charge)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
69
lighter than competition (125 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon A800 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography advice
26
good battery pack (300 CIPA)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Time Lapse mode
43
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A800 Vlogging factors
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging factors
24
has face detect autofocus
wide angle not great (37mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic socket
33
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than competition (125 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Canon A800 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A800 and Olympus VR-340
 Canon PowerShot A800Olympus VR-340
General Information
Brand Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot A800 Olympus VR-340
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2011-01-05 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip DIGIC 3 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 37-122mm (3.3x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/3.0-5.8 f/3.0-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 115 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 186 grams (0.41 pounds) 125 grams (0.28 pounds)
Dimensions 94 x 61 x 31mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Style of battery AA -
Battery model 2 x AA LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $90 $130