Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX4
Portability
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
95 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Portability
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
Canon ELPH 530 HS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 163g - 86 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Additionally referred to as IXUS 510 HS
Ricoh CX4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Canon ELPH 530 HS versus Ricoh CX4, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the ELPH 530 HS (10MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is very well matched and they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe ELPH 530 HS was brought out 18 months after the CX4 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the ELPH 530 HS grades against the CX4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are provided at Canon ELPH 530 HS Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon ELPH 530 HS over the Ricoh CX4
| ELPH 530 HS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
| Display dimension | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Canon ELPH 530 HS
| CX4 | ELPH 530 HS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Sharper display (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Canon ELPH 530 HS and Ricoh CX4
| ELPH 530 HS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon ELPH 530 HS enjoys outer dimensions of 86mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Canon ELPH 530 HS versus Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the ELPH 530 HS and the CX4.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the ELPH 530 HS and CX4 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The picture below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the ELPH 530 HS and CX4.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same MP and you should expect similar quality of photographs however you will need to take the production date of the products into consideration. The more recent ELPH 530 HS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Portrait photography camera
comes with face detection focusing
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
has manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
features touch focus
lighter than others in class (163 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh CX4 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking autofocus
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (190 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max fps low (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon ELPH 530 HS
Travel photography with Ricoh CX4
lighter than others in class (163g)
features touch focus
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
long reach (336mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (190 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh CX4 Landscape photography highlights
pretty wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3.2 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
bad battery power (190 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
has manual focus
really wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Canon ELPH 530 HS Vlogging factors
Ricoh CX4 Vlogging factors
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (163g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon ELPH 530 HS vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | Canon PowerShot ELPH 530 HS | Ricoh CX4 |
| Also referred to as | IXUS 510 HS | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 5 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II Touch TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 163g (0.36 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 86 x 54 x 20mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-9L | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $250 | $211 |