Clicky

Canon G7 X vs Leica X (Typ 113)

Portability
88
Imaging
51
Features
75
Overall
60
Canon PowerShot G7 X front
 
Leica X front
Portability
71
Imaging
58
Features
48
Overall
54

Canon G7 X vs Leica X (Typ 113) Key Specs

Canon G7 X
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-100mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
  • 304g - 103 x 60 x 40mm
  • Revealed September 2014
  • Successor is Canon G7 X MII
Leica X (Typ 113)
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12500
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F1.7-32.0) lens
  • 486g - 133 x 73 x 78mm
  • Revealed September 2014
  • Also Known as Typ 113
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon G7 X vs Leica X (Typ 113): An Expert Comparison of Two Enthusiast Large Sensor Compacts

In the world of large sensor compact cameras, enthusiasts and prosumers often find themselves weighing the tradeoffs between portability, image quality, and control. Two intriguing models launched around the same time in 2014 are the Canon PowerShot G7 X and the Leica X (Typ 113). While both aim to deliver superior image quality in a pocketable format, their design philosophies, target users, and technical executions differ in ways that strongly influence their real-world performance and appeal.

Having personally tested and compared these cameras extensively under varied shooting disciplines, this article offers a deep dive from sensor tech and ergonomics to autofocus behavior and image rendering. By drawing from hands-on experience with thousands of cameras over my 15+ years of evaluation, I will provide authoritative insights to help you decide which camera best suits your creative goals and budget.

Canon G7 X vs Leica X (Typ 113) size comparison

First Impressions: Handling, Design, and Controls

Canon G7 X: Compact Powerhouse with Usability in Mind

At a glance, the Canon G7 X lives up to the “large sensor compact” label with a sleek, pocketable body weighing just over 300 grams. Its streamlined design incorporates a fixed 24-100mm equivalent zoom lens with a bright f/1.8-2.8 aperture range - a killer combo for shooting in varied light and focal lengths.

Ergonomically, the G7 X feels exceptionally comfortable in hand. Its modest depth (about 40mm) and contoured grip facilitate one-handed operation without fatigue. The lens barrel offers smooth, precise zooming, while various tactile buttons and a rotating dial deliver exposure control on the fly. I particularly appreciated the customizable touchscreen interface, which enhances focus point selection and makes navigating menus intuitive.

Leica X (Typ 113): Boutique Minimalism with a Rangefinder Spirit

In contrast, the Leica X (Typ 113) impresses with a thoroughly minimalist design approach. At around 486 grams and noticeably chunkier dimensions, it commands a more deliberate, almost vintage rangefinder-style handling experience. The fixed 35mm f/1.7 lens signals a commitment to prime performance over versatility.

This camera lacks a tilting screen - opting for a fixed 3-inch LCD instead - and notably eschews touchscreen capabilities. Control placement feels purposefully sparse: fewer buttons, a modest number of focus points, and no continuous AF. While this simplicity appeals to purists who favor zone or manual focusing, it places more responsibility on photographer skill and limits quick shooting situations.

The higher weight combined with the larger grip and solid metal construction mark the Leica as a serious photographic tool designed for intentional imaging rather than quick snaps.

Canon G7 X vs Leica X (Typ 113) top view buttons comparison

Sensor Technology & Image Quality: Who Nails the Detail?

Sensor Sizes and Resolutions

A key technical divergence lies in sensor format. The Canon G7 X employs a 1-inch BSI CMOS sensor measuring 13.2 x 8.8 mm, with a 20-megapixel resolution. This sensor size offers significant advantages over typical compacts but still sits below APS-C or full-frame standards.

By contrast, the Leica X (Typ 113) features a much larger APS-C CMOS sensor (23 x 15.5 mm) with a 16-megapixel count. Despite the lower pixel count, the larger sensor area - about three times bigger than Canon’s - means better light gathering capacity, dynamic range, and reduced noise at high ISOs.

Canon G7 X vs Leica X (Typ 113) sensor size comparison

ISO Performance and Dynamic Range

During real-world testing, the Leica’s APS-C sensor consistently outperformed the G7 X in terms of noise control and tonal gradation, particularly in low-light scenes. While the G7 X’s DIGIC 6 processor aids noise reduction at higher sensitivities, its smaller sensor inherently limits dynamic range and ISO latitude.

Side-by-side comparisons revealed that the Leica preserves shadow and highlight details more gracefully, enabling more aggressive post-processing latitude - a critical factor for professionals or enthusiasts shooting landscapes or portraits under challenging lighting.

Color Depth and Accuracy

Canon’s 1-inch sensor delivers vibrant colors with a slight warmth that many users find pleasing straight from the camera. However, Leica’s color reproduction felt more natural and muted - akin to classic film aesthetics - with impressive accuracy especially in skin tones. This contributes to the Leica’s pedigree as a portrait and street photography tool.

Autofocus: Speed, Accuracy, and Focusing Modes

Autofocus capabilities often define a camera’s usability in dynamic shooting conditions. Here, the G7 X and Leica X show marked differences.

Canon G7 X Autofocus System

Equipped with 31 contrast-detection AF points and touch-focus functionality, the G7 X offers relatively robust focusing for a compact. Continuous AF and face detection work well in controlled lighting, achieving sharp focus quickly. I found tracking moving subjects moderately effective for casual wildlife or sports capture (six and a half frames per second burst).

However, once lighting dims or contrast decreases, autofocus speed and accuracy noticeably lag behind advanced mirrorless systems. Moreover, the lack of phase-detection AF and eye/animal AF limits its usability for professional sports or fast action.

Leica X (Typ 113) Autofocus Limitations

The Leica takes a minimalist approach with only 11 AF points. The contrast-detection system lacks continuous AF, autofocus tracking, and live view touch focusing. For this reason, I found the Leica unsuited for movement-heavy genres - its strengths lie in deliberate single shot composition.

Manual focus users will appreciate the intuitive focus ring with clear distance markers, but the lack of focus peaking or magnification tools requires a practiced hand for precision, especially in macro or portraits.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing

Both cameras do not feature official weather sealing or ruggedness certifications. The Leica’s substantial metal body feels exceptionally solid and durable, evoking a premium tactile experience. The Canon G7 X, though plastic-heavy, strikes a good balance between portability and sturdiness - light enough for travel yet confidently built for casual everyday use.

Neither model is waterproof, dustproof, or freezeproof, but thoughtful design elements like the G7 X’s articulating touchscreen and Leica’s solid lens barrel add to operational comfort.

Display and User Interface: Touch vs. Tradition

Canon G7 X vs Leica X (Typ 113) Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The G7 X’s 3-inch tilting touchscreen (about 1040k dots) significantly enhances framing options for shooting at awkward angles and target selection via touch. Its live view is bright and responsive, making it practical for video recording or street photography in varied scenarios.

Leica’s fixed 3-inch LCD (920k dots) is simpler but displays pleasing and accurate colors. However, the absence of a touchscreen or tilt function limits versatility - frustrating for vloggers or travelers seeking varied compositions quickly.

Lens Characteristics: Zoom Versatility vs. Pristine Prime Optics

Here lies a defining difference in photographic style and output.

Canon G7 X Lens

The G7 X’s 24-100mm equivalent zoom lens (f/1.8-2.8) provides notable flexibility, covering wide-angle landscapes through portrait telephoto focal lengths. The bright aperture allows decent low-light usage and subject separation via shallow depth-of-field at the wide end.

Optically, the lens is sharp centrally, though minor softness and chromatic aberrations appear at telephoto extremes. Image stabilization helps tremendously for handheld macro or telephoto shots.

Leica X (Typ 113) Lens

With its heart-stopping 35mm f/1.7 fixed prime lens, the Leica offers stunning optical quality, producing tack-sharp results edge-to-edge with beautiful bokeh. The lens’ classic focal length appeals to street photographers, documentary shooters, and portraitists who value full-frame-like rendering in a compact package.

However, its fixed focal length reduces compositional flexibility, requiring the photographer to “zoom with their feet.” The minimum focus distance (20cm) is less capable for macro applications than the Canon’s 5cm.

Shooting Disciplines and Real-World Performance

To give photography enthusiasts a practical benchmark, I assessed both cameras across various genres.

Portrait Photography

  • Canon G7 X: Fast f/1.8 aperture aids subject isolation; face detection autofocus performs well; however, smaller sensor limits creamy bokeh and skin tone rendering.
  • Leica X: Larger APS-C sensor combined with sharp f/1.7 prime renders portraits with exquisite skin tone accuracy and depth. Manual focus requires skill, but results reward patience.

Winner: Leica X for image quality and bokeh; Canon for autofocus assist and zoom versatility.

Landscape Photography

  • Canon’s zoom allows framing flexibility but is hindered by limited dynamic range.
  • Leica’s superior dynamic range captures shadow detail exquisitely, though fixed focal length constrains composition options.
  • Neither is weather sealed.

Winner: Leica X for image quality; Canon for versatility.

Wildlife Photography

  • Canon’s 6.5 fps burst and quick AF provide better chances capturing animals.
  • Leica’s slow AF, limited focus points, and 5fps burst restrict use.
  • Telephoto focal length on Canon wins over Leica’s wide prime.

Winner: Canon G7 X comfortably.

Sports Photography

  • Similar to wildlife, G7 X is better equipped with faster continuous shooting and tracking.
  • Leica’s manual approach unsuitable.

Winner: Canon G7 X.

Street Photography

  • Leica’s discreet styling, prime lens, and calm color palette make it ideal.
  • Canon is bulkier, zoom distracts, but touchscreen aids discreet focus.
  • Battery life favors Leica.

Winner: Leica for purists, Canon for convenience seekers.

Macro Photography

  • Canon’s minimum 5cm focus and optical stabilization shine.
  • Leica’s 20cm limit restricts close-ups.

Winner: Canon G7 X hands down.

Night / Astrophotography

  • Leica’s sensor excels at noise control for star fields.
  • Canon usable but noisier.
  • Lack of bulb exposures on Leica can limit astro flexibility.

Winner: Leica X marginally for image quality.

Video Capabilities

  • Canon shoots 1080p up to 60fps, offers touchscreen controls and optical stabilization.
  • Leica limited to 1080p/30fps, no stabilization, less ergonomic controls.

Winner: Canon G7 X for multimedia work.

Travel Photography

  • Canon weighs less, has zoom versatility, and superior stabilization.
  • Leica heavier but superior still image quality and battery life (approx 350 shots vs 210).

Winner: Depends on priorities - Canon for dynamics, Leica for stills quality.

Professional Workflow

  • Both output RAW, but Canon’s robust connectivity (Wi-Fi, NFC) integrates better with modern workflows.
  • Leica supports bracketing but no wireless.
  • Canon accepts UHS-I cards; Leica standard SD.

Winner: Canon for workflow versatility; Leica for final image quality emphasis.

Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity

  • Leica delivers roughly 350 shots per charge, Canon about 210 - significant if traveling without frequent charging.
  • Canon offers built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for easy sharing and remote control; Leica has none.
  • Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I on Canon), but Canon’s USB and HDMI implementations feel slightly more modern.

Summary of Performance Scores

  • According to DxOMark and practical testing, the Canon G7 X scores well for versatility and general ease of use (~71 overall).
  • Leica does not have official DxOMark scores but outperforms in sensor size-dependent categories.
  • Both excel in color depth and dynamic range in different segments.

Genre-Specific Performance

Final Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?

Choose the Canon PowerShot G7 X if…

  • You want a versatile, pocketable zoom camera with solid video capabilities.
  • You value fast and reliable autofocus for dynamic subjects.
  • You prioritize connectivity and usability - touchscreen, Wi-Fi, quick menu navigation.
  • You shoot travel, street, macro, wildlife, or casual sports where flexibility and portability matter.
  • You want modern conveniences in a compact without the bulk or need for interchangeable lenses.
  • Budget is tighter - this camera retails under $500, excellent value for a large sensor compact.

Choose the Leica X (Typ 113) if…

  • You desire exceptional image quality and classic rendering from a large APS-C sensor.
  • You prefer a prime lens with superb optics and minimalist controls.
  • You are an enthusiast or professional focused on portrait, street, or landscape photography.
  • You appreciate the tactile feel and aesthetic of a premium metal build and embrace manual focus.
  • You can overlook lack of video and AF versatility for the sake of image fidelity.
  • You have a higher budget, around $1500, and want a boutique camera that rewards investment with exquisite photographs.

Closing Thoughts

Both the Canon G7 X and Leica X (Typ 113) embody a distinct approach to large sensor compact photography. The G7 X is the all-round workhorse with zoom flexibility, fast AF, and multimedia prowess - a camera I often reach for when I need a do-it-all pocket camera.

Leica’s Typ 113, meanwhile, represents an experience-driven tool crafted for enthusiasts obsessed with image quality, tactile control, and discipline. It’s less about speed and more about visual storytelling in a pure form.

In my hands-on years of testing these cameras, the decision boils down to your creative priorities: versatility and speed versus uncompromising image quality and timeless design.

If you're seeking a reliable all-rounder with modern conveniences, the Canon wins. If you're after a special photographic instrument that inspires careful composition and rewards mastery, Leica awaits.

Sample Image Gallery: Real-world Comparisons

Explore detailed image comparisons in various lighting and genres to see how each camera interprets color, detail, and tonal gradation.

With this comprehensive analysis, I hope you find clarity in choosing the ideal camera companion. Feel free to reach out with specific questions or if you’d like tailored advice for your photography pursuits!

Canon G7 X vs Leica X (Typ 113) Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon G7 X and Leica X (Typ 113)
 Canon PowerShot G7 XLeica X
General Information
Make Canon Leica
Model type Canon PowerShot G7 X Leica X
Alternate name - Typ 113
Class Large Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2014-09-15 2014-09-23
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 6 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1" APS-C
Sensor measurements 13.2 x 8.8mm 23 x 15.5mm
Sensor area 116.2mm² 356.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Full resolution 5472 x 3648 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 12800 12500
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 31 11
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-100mm (4.2x) 35mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.8 f/1.7-32.0
Macro focusing distance 5cm 20cm
Focal length multiplier 2.7 1.6
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 40 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 6.5 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m -
Flash options Auto, on, slow synchro, off -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 304 grams (0.67 lb) 486 grams (1.07 lb)
Physical dimensions 103 x 60 x 40mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.6") 133 x 73 x 78mm (5.2" x 2.9" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 71 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.7 not tested
DXO Low light rating 556 not tested
Other
Battery life 210 photos 350 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NB-13L BP-DC8
Self timer Yes (2 0r 10 secs, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots One One
Launch price $490 $1,502