Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
69 Imaging
34 Features
27 Overall
31
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Launched January 2017
- Superseded the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Updated by Olympus SP-610UZ
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Canon G9 X II versus Olympus SP-600 UZ, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the G9 X II (1") and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe G9 X II was unveiled 7 years after the SP-600 UZ which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the G9 X II matches up against the SP-600 UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Olympus SP-600 UZ. The full galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
| G9 X II | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2017 | February 2010 | Newer by 85 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Canon G9 X II
| SP-600 UZ | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus SP-600 UZ
| G9 X II | SP-600 UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon G9 X II comes with exterior measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus SP-600 UZ has proportions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Canon G9 X II versus Olympus SP-600 UZ in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the G9 X II against the SP-600 UZ.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the G9 X II and SP-600 UZ is 92 and 69 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The image below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the G9 X II and SP-600 UZ.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The G9 X II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Canon G9 X II will provide greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger G9 X II should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2017-01-04 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 7 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 143 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.5-5.4 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 1/2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.2 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) | 455 gr (1.00 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $530 | $189 |