Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3
92 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce4c8/ce4c8a213d62e15738ce4ed22b0c5b5c77239af7" alt="Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Announced January 2017
- Older Model is Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the G9 X II (1") and SH-3 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The G9 X II was launched 12 months later than the SH-3 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the G9 X II scores against the SH-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus SH-3
G9 X II | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2017 | ![]() | February 2016 | More recent by 12 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Canon G9 X II
SH-3 | G9 X II |
---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus SH-3
G9 X II | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Canon G9 X II enjoys exterior dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Look at the Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the G9 X II versus the SH-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acd5a/acd5a3956680d413ca0b044971c0c08f5b31b141" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the G9 X II and SH-3 is 92 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0def4/0def425f752dd2080da343a137026f6bd90b4a21" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison"
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at specs. The photograph here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the G9 X II and SH-3.
All in all, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The G9 X II due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Canon G9 X II will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer G9 X II provides a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a0eb/8a0ebc9a53097af43478a005a63072d52e7debc2" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison"
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1304/a130465f926a69689833e6cd7e97f2608d1da909" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-01-04 | 2016-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 7 | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.2fps | 11.5fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206g (0.45 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 65 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 522 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 235 photos | 380 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $530 | $579 |