Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Older Model is Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Canon G9 X II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the G9 X II (1") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe G9 X II was unveiled 4 years after the TG-820 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the G9 X II matches up against the TG-820 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Canon G9 X II Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| G9 X II | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2017 | February 2012 | Newer by 60 months | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 1030k | Sharper screen (+10k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Canon G9 X II
| TG-820 iHS | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| G9 X II | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon G9 X II comes with exterior dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Canon G9 X II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the G9 X II versus the TG-820 iHS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the G9 X II and TG-820 iHS is 92 and 92 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specs. The image here might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the G9 X II and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The G9 X II having a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Canon G9 X II will give more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The newer G9 X II will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon G9 X II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2017-01-04 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 7 | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,030k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.2 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $530 | $500 |