Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce4c8/ce4c8a213d62e15738ce4ed22b0c5b5c77239af7" alt="Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/430cc/430ccaa363774e0b8d316ec9d45b25256b0dcd11" alt="Ricoh WG-4 GPS front Ricoh WG-4 GPS front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Released January 2017
- Replaced the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Canon G9 X II versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the G9 X II (1") and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The G9 X II was launched 2 years later than the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the G9 X II scores vs the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Canon G9 X II Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
G9 X II | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2017 | ![]() | February 2014 | Fresher by 36 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Canon G9 X II
WG-4 GPS | G9 X II |
---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
G9 X II | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon G9 X II comes with outer measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon G9 X II versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the G9 X II vs the WG-4 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec1ec/ec1ecdfc42fe7fbe3adcb10688e92452bdc14e10" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the G9 X II and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4df6/a4df614aa58d13cb55c125bcce5082d8653c3af6" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the G9 X II and WG-4 GPS.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The G9 X II due to its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Canon G9 X II will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more recent G9 X II provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f51cc/f51cc5cee16b43cbb135bbeadffc83738eaa5cf6" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison"
Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e002/7e0026cd9d8a25dc4c004a60b942cab837283521" alt="Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon G9 X II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2017-01-04 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 7 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.2 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 65 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 522 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 235 photographs | 240 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $530 | $210 |