Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Launched January 2017
- Succeeded the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Later Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below is a complete review of the Canon G9 X II and Sigma DP2 Merrill, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Canon and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) and the G9 X II (1") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe G9 X II was launched 4 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon G9 X II being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the G9 X II matches up against the DP2 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
| G9 X II | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2017 | February 2012 | More recent by 60 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Canon G9 X II
| DP2 Merrill | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Sigma DP2 Merrill
| G9 X II | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon G9 X II offers external dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Canon G9 X II and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the G9 X II compared to the DP2 Merrill.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the G9 X II and DP2 Merrill is 92 and 83 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The visual here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the G9 X II and DP2 Merrill.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The G9 X II because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Canon G9 X II will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent G9 X II should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sigma |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2017-01-04 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 7 | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.2 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 640x480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $530 | $931 |