Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
92 Imaging
52 Features
66 Overall
57
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-84mm (F2-4.9) lens
- 206g - 98 x 58 x 31mm
- Launched January 2017
- Succeeded the Canon G9 X
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Later Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below is a complete review of the Canon G9 X II and Sigma DP2 Merrill, both Large Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Canon and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the G9 X II (20MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) and the G9 X II (1") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe G9 X II was launched 4 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon G9 X II being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the G9 X II matches up against the DP2 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The complete galleries are provided at Canon G9 X II Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon G9 X II over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
| G9 X II | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2017 | February 2012 | More recent by 60 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Canon G9 X II
| DP2 Merrill | G9 X II |
|---|
Common features in the Canon G9 X II and Sigma DP2 Merrill
| G9 X II | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon G9 X II offers external dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Canon G9 X II and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the G9 X II compared to the DP2 Merrill.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the G9 X II and DP2 Merrill is 92 and 83 respectively.
Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The visual here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the G9 X II and DP2 Merrill.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The G9 X II because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Canon G9 X II will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent G9 X II should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Canon G9 X II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Sigma |
| Model | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2017-01-04 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 7 | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-84mm (3.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 2.7 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.2 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 640x480 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.2") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 65 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 522 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 235 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $530 | $931 |