Canon S200 vs Olympus SH-50
93 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Canon S200 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 181g - 100 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced January 2013
Canon S200 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Canon S200 vs Olympus SH-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the S200 (10MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the S200 (1/1.7") and SH-50 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S200 was manufactured 14 months after the SH-50 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the S200 matches up against the SH-50 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Canon S200 vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot S200 & Olympus SH-50. The entire galleries are available at Canon S200 Gallery & Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon S200 over the Olympus SH-50
S200 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | January 2013 | Newer by 14 months | |
Display resolution | 461k | 460k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Canon S200
SH-50 | S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon S200 and Olympus SH-50
S200 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Canon S200 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon S200 comes with physical measurements of 100mm x 59mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Olympus SH-50 has measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Canon S200 vs Olympus SH-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the S200 compared to the SH-50.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the S200 and SH-50 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Canon S200 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through a spec sheet. The image below will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S200 and SH-50.
As you can see, each of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S200 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus SH-50 will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern S200 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon S200 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon S200 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus SH-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot S200 | Olympus SH-50 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-02-21 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 5 | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-5.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 461k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 15s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 181 gr (0.40 lb) | 269 gr (0.59 lb) |
Dimensions | 100 x 59 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-6LH | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $293 | $300 |