Canon SD4000 IS vs Sony T900
94 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Canon SD4000 IS vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-105mm (F2.0-5.3) lens
- 175g - 100 x 54 x 23mm
- Released August 2010
- Additionally Known as IXUS 300 HS / IXY 30S
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon SD4000 IS vs Sony T900 Overview
Lets look closer at the Canon SD4000 IS and Sony T900, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SD4000 IS (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively similar and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SD4000 IS was released 18 months later than the T900 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Canon SD4000 IS being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SD4000 IS matches up against the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon SD4000 IS vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are available at Canon SD4000 IS Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SD4000 IS over the Sony T900
| SD4000 IS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Canon SD4000 IS
| T900 | SD4000 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon SD4000 IS and Sony T900
| SD4000 IS | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon SD4000 IS vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon SD4000 IS enjoys exterior dimensions of 100mm x 54mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Canon SD4000 IS and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the SD4000 IS compared to the T900.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SD4000 IS and T900 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Canon SD4000 IS vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The graphic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SD4000 IS and T900.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Sony T900 to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The younger SD4000 IS should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Canon SD4000 IS vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon SD4000 IS vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Sony |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SD4000 IS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Alternate name | IXUS 300 HS / IXY 30S | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-08-02 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 4 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-105mm (3.8x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-5.3 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2500 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 175 gr (0.39 pounds) | 143 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 100 x 54 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NB-6L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $300 |