Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9900
90 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-336mm (F3.4-5.3) lens
- 247g - 103 x 61 x 38mm
- Released May 2009
- Successor is Canon SX210 IS
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Earlier Model is Nikon S9700
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9900, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Canon and Nikon. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the SX200 IS (12MP) and S9900 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SX200 IS was unveiled 6 years prior to the S9900 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SX200 IS scores versus the S9900 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX200 IS and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX200 IS Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX200 IS over the Nikon S9900
| SX200 IS | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Canon SX200 IS
| S9900 | SX200 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 69 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Canon SX200 IS and Nikon S9900
| SX200 IS | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX200 IS has got outside dimensions of 103mm x 61mm x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9900 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the SX200 IS vs the S9900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX200 IS and S9900 is 90 and 88 respectively.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor measurements just by going through a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SX200 IS and S9900.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Nikon S9900 to produce greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older SX200 IS will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX200 IS vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Nikon |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot SX200 IS | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-05-14 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-336mm (12.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-5.3 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro, Manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 289 gr (0.64 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 61 x 38mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-5L | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/MMCplus HC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $329 | $300 |