Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102
69 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/219a3/219a34973a3bb3d44ce6a71223038ecd10601926" alt="Canon PowerShot SX530 HS front Canon PowerShot SX530 HS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea7e4/ea7e4ee78f1fa0fb4022ac36c31077cfef4a19c1" alt="Samsung SL102 front Samsung SL102 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 442g - 120 x 82 x 92mm
- Announced January 2015
- Replaced the Canon SX520 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Canon SX530 HS versus Samsung SL102, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the SX530 HS (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The SX530 HS was revealed 6 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX530 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the SX530 HS grades versus the SL102 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX530 HS & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are provided at Canon SX530 HS Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX530 HS over the Samsung SL102
SX530 HS | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2015 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 73 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Canon SX530 HS
SL102 | SX530 HS |
---|
Common features in the Canon SX530 HS and Samsung SL102
SX530 HS | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX530 HS provides outside measurements of 120mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") and a weight of 442 grams (0.97 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon SX530 HS versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the SX530 HS compared to the SL102.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3ecf/e3ecfbd5f647b20656d20348bd3cf467912e983f" alt="Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 size comparison Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX530 HS and SL102 is 69 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5ebe/b5ebe34e23578bfa8f412d36e6d431f0fa490d0c" alt="Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison"
Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through specs. The visual underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX530 HS and SL102.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Canon SX530 HS to result in greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger SX530 HS will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/726a3/726a3767bd65c9432f5668abe30f7e40f56d8d7c" alt="Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison"
Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4eddd/4eddd31d81a72a6ef240bdb1d8539f19c8a699c6" alt="Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon SX530 HS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX530 HS | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Samsung |
Model type | Canon PowerShot SX530 HS | Samsung SL102 |
Also Known as | - | ES55 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 4+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 0cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.6 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 442 grams (0.97 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 82 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-6LH | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $379 | $130 |