Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung SL620
63 Imaging
47 Features
67 Overall
55
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 21-1365mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 608g - 127 x 91 x 117mm
- Revealed September 2018
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Canon SX70 HS and Samsung SL620, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Canon and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SX70 HS (20MP) and SL620 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe SX70 HS was revealed 9 years later than the SL620 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX70 HS being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SX70 HS scores against the SL620 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX70 HS and Samsung SL620. The full galleries are viewable at Canon SX70 HS Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX70 HS over the Samsung SL620
| SX70 HS | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2018 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 117 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Canon SX70 HS
| SL620 | SX70 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX70 HS and Samsung SL620
| SX70 HS | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX70 HS provides exterior measurements of 127mm x 91mm x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") and a weight of 608 grams (1.34 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Canon SX70 HS and Samsung SL620 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the SX70 HS compared to the SL620.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SX70 HS and SL620 is 63 and 94 respectively.
Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SX70 HS and SL620.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Canon SX70 HS to deliver greater detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern SX70 HS should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Canon SX70 HS vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX70 HS | Samsung SL620 |
| Also Known as | - | PL65 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2018-09-20 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 8 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-1365mm (65.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 0cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, slow sync, off | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 608g (1.34 lbs) | 168g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 127 x 91 x 117mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 4.6") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Built-in | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $550 | $200 |