Canon SX700 HS vs Samsung SL102
89 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Canon SX700 HS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 269g - 113 x 66 x 35mm
- Announced February 2014
- New Model is Canon SX710 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Canon SX700 HS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Canon SX700 HS versus Samsung SL102, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Canon and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the SX700 HS (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SX700 HS was released 5 years after the SL102 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the SX700 HS matches up versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon SX700 HS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot SX700 HS and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon SX700 HS Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX700 HS over the Samsung SL102
| SX700 HS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 63 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Canon SX700 HS
| SL102 | SX700 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX700 HS and Samsung SL102
| SX700 HS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon SX700 HS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon SX700 HS has got external dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Canon SX700 HS versus Samsung SL102 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the SX700 HS and the SL102.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the SX700 HS and SL102 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX700 HS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by seeing technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SX700 HS and SL102.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Canon SX700 HS to provide extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The fresher SX700 HS provides an edge in sensor tech.
Canon SX700 HS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon SX700 HS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX700 HS | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX700 HS | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-02-12 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Digic 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | PureColor II G TFT | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 35mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-6LH | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $349 | $130 |