Canon SX730 HS vs Panasonic FZ200
88 Imaging
47 Features
59 Overall
51
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Canon SX730 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Announced April 2017
- Previous Model is Canon SX720 HS
- Refreshed by Canon SX740 HS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Updated by Panasonic FZ300
Canon SX730 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Canon SX730 HS vs Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the SX730 HS (20.3MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SX730 HS was brought out 4 years after the FZ200 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Canon SX730 HS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SX730 HS scores versus the FZ200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Canon SX730 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot SX730 HS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The entire galleries are available at Canon SX730 HS Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX730 HS over the Panasonic FZ200
SX730 HS | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2017 | July 2012 | More modern by 58 months | |
Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Canon SX730 HS
FZ200 | SX730 HS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Common features in the Canon SX730 HS and Panasonic FZ200
SX730 HS | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Canon SX730 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX730 HS has got physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Look at the Canon SX730 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the SX730 HS against the FZ200.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SX730 HS and FZ200 is 88 and 65 respectively.
Canon SX730 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SX730 HS and FZ200.
Plainly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Canon SX730 HS to offer you extra detail having its extra 8.3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer SX730 HS is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon SX730 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon SX730 HS vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Canon | Panasonic |
Model | Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-04-06 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | DIGIC 6 | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/3200 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.9 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 300 gr (0.66 lb) | 588 gr (1.30 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 photos | 540 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $399 | $499 |