Canon SX730 HS vs Samsung SL102
88 Imaging
47 Features
59 Overall
51
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon SX730 HS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-960mm (F3.3-6.9) lens
- 300g - 110 x 64 x 40mm
- Introduced April 2017
- Old Model is Canon SX720 HS
- Replacement is Canon SX740 HS
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon SX730 HS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Canon SX730 HS vs Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the SX730 HS (20.3MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SX730 HS was introduced 8 years after the SL102 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the SX730 HS scores vs the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon SX730 HS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot SX730 HS & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon SX730 HS Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon SX730 HS over the Samsung SL102
| SX730 HS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2017 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 101 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Canon SX730 HS
| SL102 | SX730 HS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon SX730 HS and Samsung SL102
| SX730 HS | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Canon SX730 HS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon SX730 HS has physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") having a weight of 300 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Canon SX730 HS vs Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the SX730 HS and the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SX730 HS and SL102 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Canon SX730 HS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SX730 HS and SL102.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Canon SX730 HS to show extra detail using its extra 10.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent SX730 HS will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon SX730 HS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon SX730 HS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot SX730 HS | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2017-04-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 6 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20.3 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-960mm (40.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/3200 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.9 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, on, slow synchro, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 300 grams (0.66 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $399 | $130 |