Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VG-160
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Released November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus VG-160, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very well matched but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and VG-160 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-10 was introduced 23 months after the VG-160 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-10 grades vs the VG-160 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus VG-160
| EX-10 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | November 2013 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 23 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Casio EX-10
| VG-160 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus VG-160
| EX-10 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 features physical dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus VG-160 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the EX-10 against the VG-160.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and VG-160 is 83 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-10 and VG-160.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus VG-160 will give more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-10 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-11-14 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 pounds) | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 shots | 165 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $456 | $90 |