Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-320
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
94 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Revealed November 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-10 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-10 (1/1.7") and VR-320 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-10 was manufactured 2 years after the VR-320 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-10 scores versus the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-10 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | November 2013 | July 2011 | More modern by 29 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-10
| VR-320 | EX-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Olympus VR-320
| EX-10 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 enjoys exterior dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-10 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-10 against the VR-320.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-10 and VR-320 is 83 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specifications. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and VR-320.
Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-10 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus VR-320 will give extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-10 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-11-14 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 250s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.90 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 grams (0.85 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-130A | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $456 | $179 |