Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-50
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Announced November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and WG-50 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-10 was announced 4 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-10 grades versus the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-10 & Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-10 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.5" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-10
| WG-50 | EX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 | November 2013 | Newer by 42 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-10 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-10 provides exterior measurements of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-10 and the WG-50.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and WG-50 is 83 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-10 and WG-50.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-10 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-50 will deliver greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-11-14 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 250 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.90 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 384g (0.85 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 455 images | 300 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-130A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $456 | $280 |