Casio EX-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
83 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 384g - 120 x 68 x 49mm
- Launched November 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the EX-10 (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and the EX-10 (1/1.7") and Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-10 was launched 15 months later than the Galaxy Camera 3G which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-10 scores versus the Galaxy Camera 3G with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-10 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-10 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
EX-10 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2013 | August 2012 | Fresher by 15 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 0k | Crisper screen (+922k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Casio EX-10
Galaxy Camera 3G | EX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 4.8" | 3.5" | Bigger screen (+1.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
EX-10 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-10 has outside dimensions of 120mm x 68mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
See the Casio EX-10 versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-10 and the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-10 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The visual here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-10 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-10 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-10 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-11-14 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS 3 | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | - |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
Screen resolution | 922k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear LCD with 180 degree upward tilt | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 250 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.90 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, off, fill-in, redeye reduction | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 384 grams (0.85 lb) | 305 grams (0.67 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 68 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.7" x 1.9") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 455 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-130A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $456 | $606 |