Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
Portability
83 Imaging
38 Features
64 Overall
48
83 Imaging
38 Features
64 Overall
48
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Key Specs
Casio EX-100
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/20000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 389g - 119 x 67 x 50mm
- Introduced February 2014
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-100 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the EX-100 (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) and the EX-100 (1/1.7") and Galaxy Camera 2 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-100 was manufactured 2 months after the Galaxy Camera 2 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the EX-100 matches up versus the Galaxy Camera 2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-100 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 2. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-100 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-100 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
| EX-100 | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Casio EX-100
| Galaxy Camera 2 | EX-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 4.8" |  | 3.5" | Bigger screen (+1.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 922k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-100 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
| EX-100 | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2014 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-100 comes with exterior measurements of 119mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") along with a weight of 389 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has proportions of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-100 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-100 against the Galaxy Camera 2.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-100 and Galaxy Camera 2 is 83 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes just by checking a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-100 and Galaxy Camera 2.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-100 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 will resolve greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively.
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-100
Portrait photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
manual focus
supports face detection focus
exports RAW files
external flash not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-100 Street photography advice
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Street photography advice
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch to focus
lighter than competition in class (283 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Casio EX-100 Sports photography highlights
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Sports photography highlights
great max shutter speed (1/20,000 seconds)
high fps (30.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
better than average battery power (390 shots)
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect auto focus
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
better than average battery pack (400 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-100 Travel photography advice
Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Travel photography advice
better than average battery power (390 shots)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
low MP (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
better than average battery pack (400 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (283 grams)
supports bluetooth
provides touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (23mm)
long reach (483mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-100
Landscape photography with Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
big screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (390 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
manual focus
rather wide (23mm)
big screen (4.8 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
better than average battery pack (400 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-100
Vlogging with Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of external mic port
rather wide (23mm)
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have microphone port
lighter than competition in class (283 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-100 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-100 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-02-06 | 2014-01-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-300mm (10.7x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 4.8" |
| Screen resolution | 922k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear LCD | HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/20000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.10 m | 3.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, redeye reduction | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 389 grams (0.86 lbs) | 283 grams (0.62 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 shots | 400 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Built-in |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $572 | $400 |
