Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh PX
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Announced August 2011
Photography Glossary Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Ricoh PX, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and PX (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-FH25 was released 13 months before the PX making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the EX-FH25 matches up vs the PX with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 & Ricoh PX. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Ricoh PX
| EX-FH25 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Casio EX-FH25
| PX | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2011 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 13 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Ricoh PX
| EX-FH25 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-FH25 features physical dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-FH25 versus Ricoh PX in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH25 and the PX.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-FH25 and PX is 69 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and PX.
As you can see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh PX to result in more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-FH25 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-FH25 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Ricoh PX |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lbs) | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $450 | $329 |