Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e49ae/e49aef02731bb86879a7a1fb2af553da6ffe5e22" alt="Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front Casio Exilim EX-FH25 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01699/01699e5c3590223af1fd702770b42712f097ec56" alt="Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G front Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G front"
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Released July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-FH25 was announced 3 years before the Galaxy Camera 4G which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-FH25 scores versus the Galaxy Camera 4G when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
EX-FH25 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Casio EX-FH25
Galaxy Camera 4G | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
Screen dimension | 4.8" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
EX-FH25 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-FH25 vs the Galaxy Camera 4G.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8fb8/b8fb865c6d8c834c48ff42b6163e5ac5e78f20d9" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G size comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 69 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04d51/04d51df4c4244c3e16520232e0d2963ce1fb3c64" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G top view buttons comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and Galaxy Camera 4G.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G to offer greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25cd1/25cd1925bb710772533515e965f164920c23cc2f" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sensor size comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b327/3b3278ab22bbd43ee590e43e571af7b5ed472a0b" alt="Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-07-06 | 2012-08-29 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | - |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lb) | 305 grams (0.67 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $450 | $550 |