Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL240
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Launched July 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is ST5000
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung TL240, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and TL240 (14MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-FH25 was announced 7 months later than the TL240 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung TL240 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-FH25 scores against the TL240 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung TL240. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung TL240
EX-FH25 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2010 | January 2010 | More recent by 7 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Casio EX-FH25
TL240 | EX-FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung TL240
EX-FH25 | TL240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-FH25 has got external dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") and a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has specifications of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the TL240.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-FH25 and TL240 is 69 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-FH25 and TL240.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Samsung TL240 to produce more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The younger EX-FH25 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung TL240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung TL240 |
Also called | - | ST5000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-07-06 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 40.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.30 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 524 grams (1.16 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $450 | $171 |