Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB35F
69 Imaging
33 Features
37 Overall
34
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 524g - 122 x 81 x 83mm
- Announced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the EX-FH25 (10MP) and WB35F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-FH25 was announced 4 years before the WB35F which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-FH25 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the EX-FH25 matches up against the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-FH25 and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-FH25 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-FH25 over the Samsung WB35F
| EX-FH25 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-FH25
| WB35F | EX-FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-FH25 and Samsung WB35F
| EX-FH25 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-FH25 enjoys exterior dimensions of 122mm x 81mm x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") having a weight of 524 grams (1.16 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Casio EX-FH25 versus Samsung WB35F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-FH25 compared to the WB35F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-FH25 and WB35F is 69 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing technical specs. The image below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-FH25 and WB35F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Samsung WB35F to offer you more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-FH25 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-FH25 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-FH25 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-07-06 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 40.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.30 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (120, 30fps), 448 x 336 (30, 120, 240 fps), 224 x 168 (420 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 524g (1.16 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 81 x 83mm (4.8" x 3.2" x 3.3") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $450 | $130 |