Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB2200F
94 Imaging
35 Features
16 Overall
27
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 154g - 104 x 64 x 20mm
- Released November 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Launched January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB2200F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the EX-G1 (12MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-G1 was unveiled 5 years before the WB2200F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-G1 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-G1 matches up against the WB2200F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-G1 & Samsung WB2200F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-G1 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-G1 over the Samsung WB2200F
| EX-G1 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-G1
| WB2200F | EX-G1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 50 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-G1 and Samsung WB2200F
| EX-G1 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-G1 has got physical dimensions of 104mm x 64mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") having a weight of 154 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has dimensions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") and a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
See the Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-G1 versus the WB2200F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-G1 and WB2200F is 94 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specifications. The image here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-G1 and WB2200F.
To sum up, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB2200F to result in greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-G1 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-G1 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-G1 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-11-18 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.40 m | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 154g (0.34 pounds) | 708g (1.56 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 104 x 64 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 0.8") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-800 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $61 | $599 |