Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR700
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR700, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Casio. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and EX-ZR700 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was brought out 4 years before the EX-ZR700 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-H10 matches up versus the EX-ZR700 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Casio Exilim EX-ZR700. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| EX-H10 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Casio EX-H10
| EX-ZR700 | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | June 2009 | More recent by 44 months |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Casio EX-ZR700
| EX-H10 | EX-ZR700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys outer measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Casio EX-ZR700 has dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
See the Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR700 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-H10 vs the EX-ZR700.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and EX-ZR700 is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading specifications. The graphic below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and EX-ZR700.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to offer extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-H10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H10 vs Casio EX-ZR700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-06-11 | 2013-01-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | EXILIM Engine HS 3 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 25-450mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 222 grams (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-90 | NP-130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $300 | $370 |