Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SP-820UZ
93 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
69 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-896mm (F3.4-5.7) lens
- 485g - 117 x 78 x 93mm
- Announced August 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
- Later Model is Olympus SP-820UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SP-820UZ, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the SP-820UZ (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H10 was launched 4 years earlier than the SP-820UZ which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a short overview of how the EX-H10 scores vs the SP-820UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus SP-820UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus SP-820UZ
| EX-H10 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-820UZ over the Casio EX-H10
| SP-820UZ | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2012 |  | June 2009 | More modern by 38 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus SP-820UZ
| EX-H10 | SP-820UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-H10 has got physical dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Olympus SP-820UZ has proportions of 117mm x 78mm x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SP-820UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-H10 and the SP-820UZ.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and SP-820UZ is 93 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The pic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and SP-820UZ.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus SP-820UZ to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus SP-820UZ Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus Stylus SP-820UZ |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-06-11 | 2012-08-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 22-896mm (40.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.4-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 15.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 180 (30, 240 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 485 grams (1.07 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 117 x 78 x 93mm (4.6" x 3.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-90 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $299 |