Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed June 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-H10 (12MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-H10 was brought out 4 years before the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-H10 scores against the TG-830 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
EX-H10 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Casio EX-H10
TG-830 iHS | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | June 2009 | Fresher by 43 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
EX-H10 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-H10 provides outside dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus TG-830 iHS has measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-H10 vs the TG-830 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-H10 and TG-830 iHS is 93 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-H10 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-830 iHS to provide you with more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The older EX-H10 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-06-11 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $300 | $0 |