Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Portability
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Portability
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
Casio EX-H10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-H10 was launched 4 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-H10 grades versus the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-H10 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-H10
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-H10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 |  | June 2009 | Fresher by 42 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-H10 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-H10 against the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and XZ-2 iHS is 93 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The EX-H10 includes the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF trickier. The older EX-H10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-H10 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
focusing manually
features face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-H10 as a Street photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
more heavy than competitors in class (346 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Casio EX-H10 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking focus
better than average battery (340 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Casio EX-H10 Travel photography details
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography details
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
missing Timelapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
better than average battery (340 per charge)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors in class (346g)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-H10 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography highlights
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
no manual control
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
missing Timelapse recording
focusing manually
really wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (340 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
missing Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
really wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes microphone jack
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
more heavy than competitors in class (346 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $300 | $450 |