Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Introduced June 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty well matched but the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was launched 4 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-H10 grades versus the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
EX-H10 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-H10
XZ-2 iHS | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | June 2009 | Fresher by 42 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
EX-H10 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H10 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-H10 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-H10 against the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and XZ-2 iHS is 93 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-H10 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The EX-H10 includes the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF trickier. The older EX-H10 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-06-11 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $300 | $450 |