Casio EX-H10 vs Sony A290
93 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 194g - 102 x 62 x 24mm
- Released June 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released June 2010
- Old Model is Sony A230
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony A290 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-H10 versus Sony A290, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-H10 (12MP) and the A290 (14MP) is very comparable but the EX-H10 (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-H10 was unveiled 12 months prior to the A290 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-H10 being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-H10 scores vs the A290 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony A290 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H10 Gallery and Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H10 over the Sony A290
EX-H10 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Casio EX-H10
A290 | EX-H10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2010 | June 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H10 and Sony A290
EX-H10 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-H10 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 62mm x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sony A290 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H10 versus Sony A290 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-H10 compared to the A290.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H10 and A290 is 93 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H10 and A290.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-H10 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A290 will produce extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-H10 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-H10 vs Sony A290 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2009-06-11 | 2010-06-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.60 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 gr (0.43 lb) | 549 gr (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 62 x 24mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-90 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $300 | $600 |