Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50
93 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
![Casio Exilim EX-H15 front Casio Exilim EX-H15 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-H15/Casio-EX-H15-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50/Sony-H50-front.jpg)
69 Imaging
32 Features
25 Overall
29
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 161g - 101 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-465mm (F2.7-4.5) lens
- 547g - 116 x 81 x 86mm
- Introduced January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-H15 versus Sony H50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the EX-H15 (14MP) and H50 (9MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The EX-H15 was introduced 12 months after the H50 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-H15 grades versus the H50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-H15 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-H15 Gallery & Sony H50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H15 over the Sony H50
EX-H15 | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 12 months |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H50 over the Casio EX-H15
H50 | EX-H15 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-H15 and Sony H50
EX-H15 | H50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-H15 features physical measurements of 101mm x 60mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 161 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony H50 has sizing of 116mm x 81mm x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 547 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-H15 versus Sony H50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the EX-H15 vs the H50.
![Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H15-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-H15 and H50 is 93 and 69 respectively.
![Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H15-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-H15 and H50.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-H15 to result in extra detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent EX-H15 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H15-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-H15-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-H50-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-H15 vs Sony H50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-H15 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H50 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-01-06 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 31-465mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.7-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 9.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps) , 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480, 30 fps, 320 x 240, 8 fps |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 161 gr (0.35 lbs) | 547 gr (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 60 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 116 x 81 x 86mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-90 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $300 | $80 |