Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-30W
91 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- 216g - 103 x 68 x 29mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-30W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-H20G (14MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-H20G was revealed 5 years earlier than the WG-30W and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-H20G matches up versus the WG-30W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-H20G & Ricoh WG-30W. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-H20G Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-H20G over the Ricoh WG-30W
| EX-H20G | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Casio EX-H20G
| WG-30W | EX-H20G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 | September 2010 | More recent by 49 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-30W
| EX-H20G | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-H20G provides outer measurements of 103mm x 68mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30W has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-H20G and Ricoh WG-30W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-H20G against the WG-30W.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-H20G and WG-30W is 91 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-H20G and WG-30W.
As you can see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30W to give you extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-H20G is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-H20G vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-H20G | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 68 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-90 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $300 | $280 |