Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
The following is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-S200 versus Ricoh CX1, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-S200 was introduced 18 months after the CX1 making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 matches up against the CX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh CX1
| EX-S200 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Casio EX-S200
| CX1 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh CX1
| EX-S200 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 has physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-S200 versus Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 vs the CX1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and CX1 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and CX1.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to render more detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-S200 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2009-02-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 180 gr (0.40 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-120 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $299 |