Clicky

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-S200 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Casio EX-S200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
  • Revealed August 2010
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Revealed February 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

The following is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-S200 versus Ricoh CX1, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The EX-S200 was introduced 18 months after the CX1 making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-S200 matches up against the CX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Ricoh CX1

 EX-S200 CX1 
RevealedAugust 2010February 2009Newer by 18 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Casio EX-S200

 CX1 EX-S200 
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh CX1

 EX-S200 CX1 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 has physical dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-S200 versus Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-S200 vs the CX1.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-S200 and CX1 is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-S200 and CX1.

To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to render more detail using its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-S200 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Portrait photography factors
Ricoh CX1 Portrait photography factors
35
manual focus
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
25
manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-S200 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Street photography camera
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-S200
Sports photography with Ricoh CX1
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Travel photography factors
Ricoh CX1 Travel photography factors
65
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (27mm)
no Time Lapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
59
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
resolution not great (9MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-S200 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh CX1 Landscape photography advice
42
manual focus
pretty wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
42
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual mode not possible
resolution not great (9MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-S200
Vlogging with Ricoh CX1
29
pretty wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic socket
28
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-S200 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-S200 and Ricoh CX1
 Casio Exilim EX-S200Ricoh CX1
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-S200 Ricoh CX1
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-08-03 2009-02-19
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4320 x 3240 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 50 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28-200mm (7.1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 132 gr (0.29 lbs) 180 gr (0.40 lbs)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-120 DB-70
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $0 $299