Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL500
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Announced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternative Name is EX1
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung TL500, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the EX-S200 (14MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the EX-S200 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-S200 was announced within a month of the TL500 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung TL500 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-S200 matches up versus the TL500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 and Samsung TL500. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung TL500
EX-S200 | TL500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Casio EX-S200
TL500 | EX-S200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung TL500
EX-S200 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2010 | July 2010 | Same generation | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-S200 offers exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung TL500 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-S200 vs the TL500.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and TL500 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing specs. The pic here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and TL500.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-S200 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-S200 will render greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung TL500 |
Also Known as | - | EX1 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-08-03 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 132 gr (0.29 lbs) | 386 gr (0.85 lbs) |
Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $527 |