Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB700
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced December 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB700, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly close and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-S200 was unveiled 4 months before the WB700 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-S200 grades against the WB700 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung WB700. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung WB700
| EX-S200 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-S200
| WB700 | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung WB700
| EX-S200 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | December 2010 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 has exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-S200 versus Samsung WB700 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-S200 compared to the WB700.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-S200 and WB700 is 96 and 98 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through technical specs. The photograph here might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-S200 and WB700.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of images although you will want to consider the age of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung WB700 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-08-03 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 50 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132g (0.29 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $300 |