Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-810
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched August 2011
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Casio EX-Z16 and Olympus TG-810, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is relatively close and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z16 was revealed 11 months prior to the TG-810 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the EX-Z16 matches up vs the TG-810 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 and Olympus TG-810. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Olympus TG-810
EX-Z16 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-Z16
TG-810 | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | September 2010 | Fresher by 11 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 0k | Crisper screen (+920k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Olympus TG-810
EX-Z16 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z16 comes with exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Olympus TG-810 has proportions of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z16 and Olympus TG-810 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z16 versus the TG-810.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and TG-810 is 99 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The photograph here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z16 and TG-810.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-810 to render greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older EX-Z16 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Olympus TG-810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Olympus TG-810 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | - | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 0k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 848x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $100 | $428 |