Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 1
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
79 Imaging
37 Features
65 Overall
48
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-300mm (F2.8) lens
- 402g - 116 x 87 x 57mm
- Announced November 2013
- Renewed by Olympus 1s
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 1 Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus 1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and 1 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and 1 (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 III was unveiled 3 years later than the 1 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the 1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus Stylus 1. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus 1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus 1
E-M10 III | 1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | November 2013 | More recent by 46 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 1 over the Olympus E-M10 III
1 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus 1
E-M10 III | 1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Olympus 1 has dimensions of 116mm x 87mm x 57mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.2") and a weight of 402 grams (0.89 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus 1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 III versus the 1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and 1 is 80 and 79 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 III and 1.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will give you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus 1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus 1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus 1 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2017-08-31 | 2013-11-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-on, off, redeye reduction slow sync, full, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p); high speed: 640 x 480 (120p), 320 x 240 (240p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 402 gr (0.89 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 116 x 87 x 57mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 51 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 179 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 410 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $650 | $700 |