Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30W
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Introduced September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
The following is a extended overview of the Casio EX-Z16 versus Ricoh WG-30W, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z16 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WG-30W which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z16 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the EX-Z16 grades vs the WG-30W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Ricoh WG-30W. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Ricoh WG-30W
EX-Z16 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Casio EX-Z16
WG-30W | EX-Z16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2014 | September 2010 | Newer by 49 months | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | " | Larger display (+2.7") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Ricoh WG-30W
EX-Z16 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z16 enjoys outer dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z16 versus Ricoh WG-30W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z16 against the WG-30W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z16 and WG-30W is 99 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z16 and WG-30W.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30W to render more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z16 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z16 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Ricoh WG-30W |
Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-09-20 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | - | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 0 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 848x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $100 | $280 |