Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL620
99 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
94 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 848 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.2-5.7) lens
- n/ag - 101 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL65
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z16 (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very close and they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z16 was announced 20 months later than the SL620 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z16 grades against the SL620 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z16 & Samsung SL620. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z16 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z16 over the Samsung SL620
| EX-Z16 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 20 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-Z16
| SL620 | EX-Z16 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | " | Larger display (+2.7") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z16 and Samsung SL620
| EX-Z16 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z16 has got exterior dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z16 and the SL620.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z16 and SL620 is 99 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing specs. The photograph below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z16 and SL620.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you have to take the age of the cameras into account. The newer EX-Z16 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z16 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z16 | Samsung SL620 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL65 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | - | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 0k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 848x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 168g (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $100 | $200 |
