Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Announced February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

In this article, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX1, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-Z2000 was manufactured 11 months later than the CX1 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the CX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh CX1

 EX-Z2000 CX1 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010February 2009More recent by 11 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 CX1 EX-Z2000 
Screen resolution920k461kSharper screen (+459k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX1

 EX-Z2000 CX1 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z2000 and the CX1.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and CX1 is 95 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out specs. The visual underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and CX1.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Casio EX-Z2000 to produce extra detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z2000 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Portrait photography camera
34
has manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
25
has manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
MP count low (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Street photography with Ricoh CX1
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than others (152 grams)
55
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh CX1 Sports photography highlights
38
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
MP count low (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography information
Ricoh CX1 Travel photography information
62
megapixel count good (14MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (152g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
59
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
MP count low (9MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Landscape photography camera
46
has manual focus
quite wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
42
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
MP count low (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Vlogging camera
28
quite wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external mic socket
heavier than others (152g)
28
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh CX1
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Ricoh CX1
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Ricoh CX1
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-01-06 2009-02-19
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28-200mm (7.1x)
Max aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.3-5.2
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 461k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152g (0.34 pounds) 180g (0.40 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-110 DB-70
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $0 $299